Technology tracker

Ammonia technology readiness

Technology Readiness Level (TRL) assessments for the key technologies in the green ammonia value chain — from electrolysers and synthesis to cracking, fuel cells, and marine engines. Updated quarterly.

TRL 1–3: Research
TRL 4–6: Demonstration
TRL 7–8: Pre-commercial
TRL 9: Commercial
Synthesis & production
Alkaline electrolysis (ALK)
Green H₂ production — large scale
9
TRL / 9
Mature commercial technology. Large-scale alkaline electrolysers are the dominant pathway for green hydrogen at scale today. Capex declining rapidly with scale.
Cost: $400–800/kW
Efficiency: 63–71%
Scale: Up to 100+ MW
Nel ASAThyssenKrupp UhdeCumminsJohn Cockerill
PEM electrolysis
Green H₂ — high purity, fast response
8
TRL / 9
Commercial at small-to-mid scale. Better suited to intermittent renewable coupling than ALK. Higher capex but faster response time and higher pressure output.
Cost: $700–1400/kW
Efficiency: 67–74%
Scale: Up to 20 MW modules
ITM PowerSiemens EnergyPlug PowerCummins
Haber-Bosch synthesis (green)
NH₃ synthesis from green H₂
9
TRL / 9
The Haber-Bosch process itself is fully commercial — over 100 years of operation. The challenge is coupling it cost-effectively with intermittent renewable H₂ supply, which requires oversized synthesis loops or H₂ storage buffers.
Conditions: ~450°C / 200 bar
Catalyst: Iron (Fe)
Haldor TopsoeKBRThyssenKrupp UhdeCasale
SOEC electrolysis
Solid oxide — highest efficiency
6
TRL / 9
Highest theoretical efficiency (~85%) but requires high operating temperature (~800°C). Currently at demonstration scale — significant potential if cost and durability challenges are solved. Best suited to coupling with industrial waste heat.
Efficiency: ~80–85%
Challenge: Durability at temp
Haldor TopsoeSunfireBloom Energy
Cracking & reconversion
Catalytic ammonia cracking
NH₃ → H₂ + N₂ thermal route
7
TRL / 9
Pre-commercial. The dominant cracking pathway — thermally decomposing ammonia over a catalyst (typically ruthenium or nickel). Large-scale demonstration plants operating. Key challenge: achieving 85%+ H₂ yield at commercial scale to make import economics work.
Current yield: 70–80%
Target yield: 85%+
Temp: 400–600°C
ThyssenKrupp UhdeHaldor TopsoeAir LiquideKBR
Plasma cracking
Non-thermal plasma decomposition
4
TRL / 9
Early demonstration. Non-thermal plasma can crack ammonia at ambient temperature, avoiding the energy penalty of heating to 400–600°C. High energy input per unit currently limits economics, but promising for small-scale or distributed applications.
Advantage: Ambient temp
Challenge: Energy per kg H₂
Syzygy PlasmonicsEindhoven Univ.DIFFER
Electrochemical cracking
Electrolytic NH₃ decomposition
3
TRL / 9
Research stage. Direct electrochemical oxidation of ammonia to produce hydrogen without combustion. Very low technology maturity but theoretically attractive due to low temperature operation and potential for co-generation of nitrogen fertiliser.
Status: Lab / pilot
Timeline: 2030+
Monash UniversityKAUSTVarious academic
Membrane reactor cracking
H₂-selective membrane + catalyst
5
TRL / 9
Pilot scale. Combining a palladium membrane with catalytic cracking allows continuous removal of H₂ product, driving conversion efficiency above equilibrium limits. Potentially higher yield than conventional catalytic cracking but membrane cost and durability remain challenges.
Potential yield: 90%+
Challenge: Pd membrane cost
Haldor TopsoeJohnson MattheyOsaka Univ.
End use — power & marine
Direct ammonia combustion — marine two-stroke
Ship propulsion, MAN B&W / Wärtsilä
8
TRL / 9
Near-commercial. MAN B&W two-stroke ammonia engines are at sea-trial stage with first commercial vessels delivering 2024–25. Key challenge is NOx emissions management — ammonia combustion produces significant N₂O/NOx requiring advanced after-treatment.
Vessels ordered: 80+
First delivery: 2024–25
MAN Energy SolutionsWärtsiläWinGD
Ammonia co-firing — power generation
Blending with coal / gas in power plants
8
TRL / 9
Commercial in Japan. JERA Hekinan plant co-firing at 20% ammonia blend with coal — first utility-scale commercial operation globally. Japan's national strategy targets 20% co-firing across all coal plants by 2030. NOx management and corrosion remain engineering challenges.
Lead market: Japan / South Korea
Blend: 20% target
JERAIHI CorporationMitsubishi Power
Direct ammonia SOFC
Solid oxide fuel cell — no cracking step
5
TRL / 9
Pilot scale. SOFCs can internally crack ammonia at their operating temperature (~700–800°C) and directly use the hydrogen for power generation — eliminating a separate cracking step. Potentially highest-efficiency end-use pathway. Durability and scale-up are primary barriers.
Efficiency: ~60–70% electrical
Advantage: No external cracker
AFC EnergyBloom EnergyHaldor TopsoePOSCO Energy
Ammonia gas turbines
Combustion turbine — power generation
6
TRL / 9
Demonstration scale. Gas turbines modified for ammonia combustion have been demonstrated at MW scale in Japan. Lower NOx challenge than coal co-firing due to higher combustion temperatures. Mitsubishi Power targeting commercial scale by 2025–2027.
Lead developer: Mitsubishi Power
Commercial: ~2027
Mitsubishi PowerIHIJAXA
Comparison overview

Technology comparison at a glance

TechnologyTRLCommercial byKey challengeCost trend
Alkaline electrolysisTRL 9NowCapex reduction at scale↓ Rapid decline
PEM electrolysisTRL 8NowPlatinum group metal supply↓ Declining
Green Haber-BoschTRL 9NowH₂ buffering for intermittent RE→ Stable
Catalytic crackingTRL 72026–27Yield efficiency (>85%)↓ Declining
Ammonia marine engineTRL 82024–25NOx after-treatment→ Stable
NH₃ co-firing (power)TRL 8Now (Japan)Supply chain / logistics→ Stable
Membrane reactor crackingTRL 52028–30Pd membrane cost & durability↓ Early stage
Direct NH₃ SOFCTRL 52028–30Durability at high temp↓ Early stage
NH₃ gas turbinesTRL 62027NOx at full load↓ Declining
Plasma crackingTRL 42030+Energy efficiencyUnknown
SOEC electrolysisTRL 62028+Durability at 800°C↓ Early stage
Electrochemical crackingTRL 32035+Fundamentally unproven at scaleUnknown